#ADOBE GOLIVE FRAMES PROBLEMS HOW TO#
#ADOBE GOLIVE FRAMES PROBLEMS CODE#
#ADOBE GOLIVE FRAMES PROBLEMS PROFESSIONAL#

But, FrontPage's proprietary code and its dependency on server side extensions left it far behind Dreamweaver. Prior to GoLive 4 for Windows' release, Microsoft FrontPage was considered to be Dreamweaver's closest competitor for Windows. Which Software?Īlthough GoLive 4 was released in 1999, it's a bit of a newcomer in the Windows-centric cave I live in. There are two biggies who meet these needs: Adobe GoLive and Macromedia Dreamweaver.

#ADOBE GOLIVE FRAMES PROBLEMS PROFESSIONAL#

Professional visual authoring tools should have a clean interface, multimedia capabilities, advanced site management for multiple users, support for server side scripting, and more. They appease the needs of the masses-from print designers who've barely touched the Web, to experienced developers who have neither the time nor the desire to code complex Web pages by hand.īecause we're serious about making professional Web pages, we need to be serious when we choose professional tools. Most Web designers and developers have experimented with visual HTML authoring tools. Tell me which product you're interested in and what kind of information you feel Web Review can provide to help you do your very best work. What's more, if you'd like to see coverage on individual products, let me know. Since I'm not entirely sure about the ratio of readers who are using visual editors, I encourage you to drop us line and let us know. And, to not at least mention FrontPage, which is extremely popular, may also be a mistake.

#ADOBE GOLIVE FRAMES PROBLEMS HOW TO#

So, when I first read this informative article, I had the sense that readers who work with FrontPage might feel a bit short-sheeted.ĭespite the fact that I think knowing how to code is more useful than relying on a software package, I also contend that it's very important for all of useven the most hard-core markup authorto respect the role that visual design tools play in the industry.

The receiver has NFE = 14, LAS = 12 and a frame with sequence number 13 arrives.CD Home Web Authors GoLive versus Dreamweaverīut What About Front Page ? From time to time I get letters to the editor asking why we don't do much coverage on Microsoft FrontPage.

The sender has LFS = 9, LAR = 6 and an ACK for frame 10 arrives.

The sender has LFS = 9, LAR = 6 and an ACK for frame 8 arrives.

The receiver has NFE = 14, LAS = 12 and a frame with sequence number 0 arrives.

The receiver has NFE = 14, LAS = 12 and a frame with sequence number 15 arrives.

The sender has LFS = 9, LAR = 6 and the timer for frame 7 expires.

Start with a sender and receiver with 4-bit sequence numbers and window sizes of 4.

The ACK for message 6 is delayed and doesn't arrive until after the ACK for message 8.

Message 5 is delayed and doesn't arrive until after message 7.

Simulate the behavior of this protocol for 10 packets where the following things happen:

Suppose that you have an SWP which uses 3 bit sequence numbers and a window size of 4 on each end.

Is the protocol complete and consistent, so that it always recovers from any error and ends in reasonable state.

Using a finite-state automata description, describe the protocol that you use to get a can of soda pop out of a machine.

Knowledge, Comprehension & Problem Solving Terms How do byte-based SWP's differ from buffer-based SWP's?.What are the ways that error recovery can be handled in an SWP?.What are the issues in choosing a sequence number size?.What are the issues in choosing a window size?.How does an SWP handle each of the four reliability issues? Is there any of them that it cannot resolve completely?.

What are the components of an SWP and how do they affect the packet format?.

Why do we need something like a sliding window protocol?.

Read section 2.5 in the text and the notes.

Understand the properties of byte-based sliding window protocols.

Be able to calculate the utilization of a sliding window protocol.

Be able to objectively evaluate the alternative ways of implementing sliding window protocols.

Understand the structure of sliding window protocols.

Most reliable protocols are sliding window protocols of one type or another, and they are very similar in structure. The solution is a type of protocol commonly known as a sliding window protocol. Protocols without any form of acknowledgement have reliability problems, but stop-and-wait and automatic request protocols suffer from very poor utilization.

Adobe golive frames problems